SWiRL-SR™ Systematic Review Librarian

Sign up to download the SWiRL-SR ™ checklist today and find out how you can keep “librarians-in-the-loop” ™ (Roth, S).

profile

SWiRL-SR
Standards for Working with Research
Librarians-on Systematic Reviews

Your key to a high quality systematic review

Many thanks to the following organizations who contributed their Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or co-author agreement/policy to make this project possible.

Augusta University, Robert B. Greenblatt, M.D. Library

Austin Health & Mercy Hospital for Women, Health Sciences Library

ChristianaCare, Medical Libraries

Cooper Medical School of Rowan University

Duke University, Medical Center Library & Archives

Emory University Libraries, Woodruff Health Sciences Center Library

Indiana University Library

Long Island Jewish Medical Center Library

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, MSK Library

National Jewish Health Library

Princeton University Library

Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Boxer Library

Ruth Lilly Medical Library at Indiana University School of Medicine

Scripps Mercy Hospital, Melisa Reasner McGuire Health Sciences Library

Stoney Brook University Libraries, Health Sciences Library

Temple University Libraries

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Davis Library

The University of Iowa, Hardin Library

Thomas Jefferson University, Scott Memorial Library

University of Basel, University Medical Library

University at Buffalo Libraries, The Abbott Library

University of Connecticut, UCONN Library

University of Massachusetts, Amherst Libraries

University of New Mexico Health Sciences Library and Informatics Center

University of Pennsylvania, Holman Biotech Commons

University of South Alabama, Charles M Baugh Biomedical Library

University of South Australia, Library

University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Health Sciences Library

University of Texas Libraries – phase II

University of Victoria Libraries

Weill Cornell Medicine, Samuel J. Wood Library

West Virginia University, Health Sciences Library

When sharing this work, you may use the citation:

SWiRL-SR. Roth, Stephanie. (2025). Systematic Review Librarian. https://systematicreviewlibrarian.com/swirl-sr/

Author: Stephanie C. Roth, MLIS (AHIP-D)

Standards for Working with Research Librarians- on Systematic Reviews

SWiRL-SR (2025)

SWiRL-SR Statement:

Research librarians and/or information specialists, from here on out and for this work, will be referred to as librarians. Librarians may support researchers and participate in creating comprehensive literature searches for systematic reviews (evidence syntheses). Despite their knowledge and expertise in this area, how they work with teams on these detailed projects is not understood by all. This standard was developed in response to these growing complexities of co-authorship and misunderstandings that often arise, with sometimes no clear description and a general lack of understanding of the librarian’s role on teams, such as: what constitutes librarian co-authorship, what are the librarians’ individual and/or professional values around research integrity and quality. Librarians are not driven to publish from external pressures or validation. The rapid pace of academic publishing is in contrast to their motivation to help others do their best work. As a profession known for the responsibility and reliability of information, librarians need to be assured that the work they are co-authoring is reliable and meets the current standards for publishing. As more librarians’ (and information specialists) support systematic reviews/evidence syntheses, many libraries or institutions have created co-author agreements, Memorandums of Understanding, other policies, and/or Terms of Service documents (often requiring signatures of both the librarian and the principal investigator), to help protect their time and their scholarship, to avoid burnout, and to have their expertise or contributions recognized and respected.

While each library may have a formal or informal agreement with teams, SWiRL-SR, is not a replacement; it can be used as a supplement to take these agreements one step further to create a universal language for how to work with your librarian when they are co-authored on a systematic review.

Current agreements relate primarily to what researchers and librarians (information specialists) will do, but very few address the protection or control of their scholarship and/or how they are treated or respected on the team. While there is a benefit to include librarians as co-authors for systematic reviews, there’s very little to address what a respectful working relationship looks like that positions the librarian as an integral team member for systematic reviews. This is the purpose of SWiRL-SR, to fill this gap.

In systematic reviews, we see the line, “worked with a librarian or information specialist”; this has become mandatory for anyone publishing their systematic review, due to the National Academies (Science, Engineering, Medicine), Standards for Systematic Reviews (2011). However, this requirement can be misconstrued or used improperly when there are no clear parameters around how they work with a librarian. When this partnership is true and the librarian is valued, respected, and treated like an equal team member, the quality and rigor of the review are much higher.

When teams adopt and become familiar with SWiRL-SR, they not only choose to commit to caring about the how, but also the person behind the search; here they will find a partner in systematic reviews; this investment is the best investment for a systematic review team. It’s not the tool that makes the review, it’s the people and the ability to create a team where all can thrive and succeed.

The SWiRL-SR Checklist includes the following categories. These categories were identified by reviewing 31 Memorandums of Understanding or co-author agreements currently used by systematic review librarians in all settings (hospital, medical, non-medical, university, cancer centers) and types (fee-based or free); and from my own knowledge of supporting and working with researchers in a variety of settings (clinical, medical academic/university, hospital, cancer center) Many thanks to the 31 libraries/institutions who contributed to Phase 1 of this project and made this project possible. Contributing to this project is not an endorsement of the project or the contents of this project, website, or future iterations.

Checklist:

Links to download the checklist are above or visit swirlsr.org

Systematic Review Librarian/SWiRL-SR:

Created by Medical Librarian, Stephanie C. Roth, MLIS (AHIP-D)

Contact: systematic review librarian @ outlook .com

Pricing for services available by request.

Stephanie Roth is the copyright owner of this website. Content cannot be resold, shared or reproduced without permission of the copyright owner.